Page 68 - LAS CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES EN EL ANTROPOCENO - DIGITAL(1)

“reglas”, “normas” y “estrategias”, donde de impactos ambientales y sociales serán promotoras de la articulación de
cobra relevancia la identificación de las (ONU HÁBITAT COLOMBIA et al. 2015), los instrumentos para la gestión de las
fuentes de monitoreo, que permiten o finalmente, se presenta la propuesta áreas protegidas urbanas.
no la adaptación de las instituciones a la de nueve lineamientos de gestión,
realidad del contexto. Con todo lo anterior que posibilitan la articulación entre los
y teniendo en cuenta las tendencias del instrumentos para la gestión de las áreas
crecimiento urbano que se proyectan protegidas urbanas, que se reclama para
nivel nacional, que advierten sobre la sostenibilidad del territorio desde la
las demandas correspondientes de PNGIBSE. Para su implementación, se
servicios ecosistémicos y la generación incluye una caja de herramientas, que

SUMMARY

n Colombia, the management of the vision of PNGIBSE, which implies a great adopted to understand the functioning
protected areas declared within the institutional challenge as noted Paredes of the formal institutions addressed in
Iframework of the National System Leguizamón (2018). The results of the this case, based on the synergy between
of Protected Areas SINAP (Ministry developed phases are presented, initially institutional statements, defined as
of Environment and Sustainable the attributes for the management of 25 “rules”, “norms” and “strategies”, where
Development, 2010), have played a APUs were identified, 16 areas that make the identification of the monitoring
fundamental role in the development up the SIDAP of the city of Bogotá, and sources becomes relevant, which allow
of the territory, to which is added the 9 areas that make up the SIMAP of the or not the adaptation of the institutions
Regional System of Protected Areas municipality of Medellín. Subsequently, to the reality of the context. With all
(SIRAP), the Metropolitan System of through the application of the content the above, and taking into account the
Protected Areas (SIMAP), and the District analysis methodology, on the 109 urban growth trends that are projected
System of Protected Areas (SIDAP). management instruments addressed at the national level, which warn
Although these last two arise from the in both contexts, the positive and about the corresponding demands for
urban context, they are problematized negative relationships were identified ecosystem services and the generation
from the logic of the National Policy for that constitute one of the explanatory of environmental and social impacts
the Integral Management of Biodiversity factors of the articulation between the (UN HÁBITAT COLOMBIA et al. 2015),
and its Ecosystem Services (PNGIBSE), instruments based on the axes of the finally it is presents the proposal of nine
since it presupposes their operation PNGIBSE: 1) Conservation and Care of management guidelines, which make
from the articulation between the Nature; 2) Governance and Creation of possible the articulation between the
management instruments, as the main Public Value of Biodiversity; 3) Economic instruments for the management of
tool to solve the socio-environmental Development, Competitiveness urban protected areas, which is claimed
problems that come together in the and Quality of Life; 4) Knowledge for the sustainability of the territory from
urban context. In this sense, the general Management; 5) Risk Management the PNGIBSE. For its implementation, a
objective of this research was to develop and 6) Co-responsibility and Global toolbox is included, which will promote
a proposal for articulation between the Commitments. Additionally, elements the articulation of instruments for the
instruments for the management of of analysis provided by Ostrom (1995), in management of urban protected areas.
urban protected areas (APU), from the his work “A Grammar of Institutions” are

59