Page 286 - LAS CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES EN EL ANTROPOCENO - DIGITAL(1)
P. 286
SUMMARY
n order to identify and make visible semi-structured interview, participant Cross Impacts and Multiplication
the strategies of adoption and observation, informal conversation and Applied to a Classification (MICMAC),
Iadaptation to climate change and social mapping. In the second moment, determining those with the greatest
climate variability taken by the farmers a review of the proposed guidelines direct and indirect influence to face
of the municipality of La Bella, Pereira, on adoption and adaptation to climate climate change and climate variability.
as well as the guidelines proposed by change and climate variability was This study represented one of the first
the public institutions of the region, carried out from 1998 to 2018 in the efforts in the area of study to examine
elements whose study is fundamental Basin Development and Management the relationships between farmers’
when planning and promoting the Plans (POMCAS) and the Municipal perceptions, concerns about climate
development of the rural sector, the Development Plans (PDM) for the city change, and attitudes and strategies
following moments were developed: IIn of Pereira establishing categories and towards adaptive management
the first, five farms of jurisdiction of La subcategories of analysis. During the in agriculture, concluding that
Bella were characterized according to third moment, adapting the analytical communities should be empowered
their changes in land uses and practices framework of Participatory Social Return through the development of capacities
associated with responses of adoption on Investment (PSROI), the relationships to deal with climate change, as well
and adaptation to climate change between strategies against climate as finding solutions to protect them
and climate variability, deepening the change and climate variability at the against the negative consequences of
farm-climate relationship and using agricultural and institutional level this in public management instruments.
ethnographic methods such as dialogue, were analyzed through a Matrix of
REFERENCIAS
Adger, N.; Dessai, S.; Goulden, M.; Hulme, Seaweed Extractors in Pisco-Perú. Port- agricultural adaptation in western Kenya.
M.; Lorenzoni, I.; Nelson, D.; Wreford, A. land International Conference on Mana- Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for
(2009). ¿Are there social limits to adapta- gement of Engineering & Technology, Global Change, 301-322.
tion to climate change? Climatic Change, PICMET 2009; Proceedings, (págs. 1025- Magrin, G.; Travasso, M.; López, G.; Rodríguez,
335-354. 1032). Portland. G.; Lloveras, A. (2007). Vulnerabilidad
Agrawal, A. (2008): The Role of Local Insti- Anderies, J.M.; Janssen, M.A. (2011). The fra- de la producción agrícola en la Región
tutions in Adaptation to Climate Chan- gility of robust social-ecological systems. Pampeana, Argentina. 2da comunicación
ge. Social Dimensions of Climate Change Global Environmental Change, 21(4), nacional sobre el cambio climático.
Workshop, World Bank; Washington, DC. 1153–1156. Shuaibu, H.; Akpoko, J.; Umar, S. (2014). Farm
Altieri, M.; Nicholls, C. (2008). Los impactos Campos, M.; Herrador, D.; Manuel, C.; McCall, M. Households’ Coping Strategies to Clima-
del cambio climático sobre las comuni- (2013). Adaptation strategies to climate te Change: A Review. British Journal of
dades campesinas y de agricultores tra- change in two rural communities in Mexi- Applied Science & Technology, 2864-
dicionales y sus respuestas adaptativas. co and El Salvador. Boletín de la Asocia- 2877.
Agroecología, 7-28. ción de Geógrafos Españoles, 433-436. Ulloa, A. (2011). Perspectivas culturales del cli-
Alvarez, J.; Vodden, K. (2009). Local Ecological Chaudhury, A.S.; Helfgott, A.; Thornton, T.F.; ma. Bogotá D.C.: Universidad Nacional de
Knowledge and the Impacts of Global Sova, C. (2016). Participatory adaptation Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas.
Climatic Change on the Community of planning and costing. Applications in
277
277